"Wait, so you're saying that you take an unusual position on sex."
"No no, what I'm saying is that the way we talk about sex in the church is absolutely nonsensical- taking a "position" on sex, if we are honest about what sex is, is like taking a position on food! There may be a way to deal with food that affirms eating in its fullness and a way that promotes unhealthiness, and the same may be said of the way we deal with sex, but surely we cannot consider separately the concept of pizza from the whole experience of a life dependent on nourishment any more than we can separate the act of intercourse from the whole experience of sexual relationships and consider it independently."
"Ok."
"Why then, is our entire dialogue as a church enslaved to a discussion of parts as removed from a whole? Dealing only with intercourse is like labeling a 3 square mile section of ocean on a map and expecting that distinction to be meaningful as anything other than a label on a map. I am not interested in claiming that sex "does not matter." Instead, I am saying that the way we deal with sex, the way we look to interact sexually in a way that affirms life as a weighty affair, cannot begin and end with our idolatrous focus on a single act as a sort of behavioral test of Christianity. We take the act of intercourse and call that sex, and talk about it, take positions on it, build up systems around it, all while ignoring the fact that sexuality is a part of life that is deeply ingrained in our way of interacting with the world around us. Clearly, I am no longer speaking of sex, and speaking of the range of human life and relationships, which we seem to want to separate into pieces so that we might more easily consider the merits of those pieces independent of context. I consider this crazy talk."
"I think that makes sense. In a way it is highly representative of our desperate need to grasp (I use the word grasp to deliberately bring to mind both understanding and possessing/controlling, because for us, our need to understand is very linked to our need to control) things in general. It reminds me of economics- we make models of things that are too big for us to comprehend, because it is our only way to bring them down to a size we can wrap our heads around. In a way, this is all we can do, so modelmaking isn't necessarily a problem. The problem is that we don't make our models humbly, waiting for them to be torn down, because they are models after all. instead we expect the thing we're making a model of to be limited by and act in accordance with out model, and it's very hard not to blind ourselves to the inadequacies of our models, so dependent we are on them."
"We're talking about God now, aren't we."
"When were we not?"
Reorganized and Slightly Fictionalized Excerpts of a Conversation Had in Barnes and Noble.
Labels: classic , fiction , nonfiction , The Theologian
Rethinking.
So I haven't been writing every day. Obviously. I'm realizing as Rachel is that I am too wary of letting people in to work that is "unpolished". So here it is- from here on out I make no claims as to quality. Also this will not just be for writing but for music, photography, design- any artistic expressions.
Anyways, today is music:
Paul Over James? from Sean Capener on Vimeo.
Labels: maintenance , music , The Theologian
Embodiment.
Sometimes I'm not sure
if I have a soul
or if being a body is more beautiful, more heavenly
and I think that the beauty of Casa Gourmet Burrito might be theology.
Labels: The Theologian
In Which I Find God
I found You in high school I think.
Maybe Jr. High.
I found you in the hormone combinations and chemically induced euphorias of music
and people who agreed with me.
I found You in the brown faces
of those poor, poor, folks who were born in that god-forsaken Tecate country
when they thanked me for solving all of their problems
which, by the way, only I could solve. Or at least someone of my privilege.
Well anyway, I found You, and it was great.
You made my path straight, like the walk across the lawn from the library to Wilden
as opposed to needing to follow the cornered sidewalk, which would be very inconvenient.
You set my mind to rightness
and I knew that all of my beliefs could be assured to be correct
because it's all about beliefs anyway
faith is believing that I'm right about you, and I can prove it
unlike all those unbelievers and evolutionists and gays
who are just deluding themselves by ignoring the pure logical construct that is You
oh God of Reason and America.
You taught me to bleed all over the flag to keep it running red.
Admittedly and idea I stole from Mission: Impossible III
And that capitalism and democracy were as core to a Christian Worldview© as, well, as You were.
And possibly more than You were. Because in the end, what You want from me is a worldview, right?
You want me to be correct, and logically sound, and solid.
Anyways, I guess I don't need You anymore. Because I built You out of logic.
Maybe next time, You find me.
Labels: poetry , The Theologian
Library Day, Library Day!
Sir,
could you find me a book about the Hardy Boys?
or maybe something by Karl Barth.
I could be in the mood for Commander Toad or a book about sew-your-own costumes or
perhaps Cavanaugh's Torture and Eucharist is more what I'm after.
Maybe I want to feel the hugeness of the pages, with wonder, wonder, wonderful images
dancing off pages. Maybe today I believe in UFOs or
maybe I could be an astronaut.
Maybe I want to buckle down and let passionate thoughts and ideological treatises engage me in
relevant, stimulating discourse.
I don't know. This place is magic.
Labels: library , poetry , The Child , The Theologian